Monday, May 1, 2017

Whiteness in the Handmaid's Tale

I came across a thread on twitter about race in The Handmaid's Tale that is very contrary to how we've talked about the novel in class and how I have thought about it in my recent blog posts. I thought the threat by Mikki Kendall (@Karnythia on Twitter) was something every fan of the novel should think about so I'm going to retype the Tweets below:

"The incredible whiteness of Handmaid's Tale has left me completely underinvested in watching it or rereading it."

"Also if the worst you can imagine is a reality where your children are stolen & you are subjugated...well white feminism lets talk."

"Handmaid's Tale had more of an impact before I knew about reproductive tourism & how transracial adoption can be trafficking in some cases"

"I don't know, the all white dystopia framework bothers me on so many levels."

"It requires me to believe that not only are my people gone, but often that they vanished quietly without any real resistance. As if."

"Like...Black people did not survive slavery, Jim Crow & the War on Drugs to be taken out by a handful of white boys with guns."

"Realistically no community of color in America would go down without a fight & frankly we would band together to win."

"White middle class women might not be ready to knuckle up. But...that means get your weight up. Stop projecting."

"Even the first time I read it I couldn't understand Offred's passiveness. And I was 13. Her logic was very "White girl in horror movie"

""I can't go to my job, access money or vote anymore. I'll just wait here & hope" NOPE. You leave when shit starts going left."

"Also hi, this myth that inner cities are full of cowards that won't fight...beloved that is all these folks do. That's how they survive."

"There's a scene where Offred sees a Black woman in passing & describes her hopeless stare & cheap clothes & well..."

"A community of Black people facing oppression fights back. So do Latinx, Asian & Indigenous communities. And poor white communities"

"That's not projection. That's American history. We know flour can be used to make a bomb for a reason. So the lack of rebels bugs me"

"Realistically the women would be poisoning the men & blowing up their homes long before any new framework could be established."

"You can fight a whole rebellion with household supplies in a pinch....I just got a plot bunny. DAMN IT"

Okay, so those are all her tweets on the subject. I have to confess I hadn't thought about the novel like that all until reading her thoughts, but they make a lot of sense. It does seem somewhat racist and counter-intuitive to me that the majority of black Americans would essentially be forced back into a type of slavery by being Marthas or working in the colonies - realistically those people would never give in that easily. Atwood is not concerned with how her dystopian world impacts people of color, she focuses so wholly on the impact towards white women while largely ignoring the many other stories. Part of this is surely because she wrote the novel in the 1980s, but that doesn't mean she should not be criticized for it.

The Hulu show has clearly tried to make the show more intersectional (not that they would use that word since the show shies away from feminist language) - since in the show Luke and Moira are black as well as other minor characters. However, Rita is still black, which matters too. I still think the world and story Atwood created are important and somewhat feminist, however there is clearly more criticism needed by black feminists and scholars. Any discussion of The Handmaid's Tale as a seminal feminist text ought to include a discussion of how the novel fails people of color, especially women, by failing to tell their stories and underestimating how easily their communities would be destroyed and repressed.

1 comment:

  1. These are important points. I think you are right that it should lead to discussion and criticism. The text is problematic.

    Thinking about it more myself, black women and Latinas are subjugated as the Marthas. Black men, really all non-white men, are entirely missing from the book. I think something that gets missed in the "but we'd fight back!" argument is that when big shit goes down (congress and president killed, martial law, no one knows what's happening, massive environmental disaster), people stop acting collectively and start just trying to make things ok for themselves. Likewise, you immediately lose all legal protections for equality and nondiscrimination. I think the book highlights just how unfortunate it is that we still need those things to be LAW because we can't just see all people as equal.

    Moreover, Gilead is not the entirety of the US. We're only seeing the small slice that is around Boston. The snippets from the book about other parts of the country suggest that it is a war-zone, but that various groups are still fighting off Gilead.

    I think it is valid to have a discussion about race and the book. I think I can do a better job of that in future classes myself. But it does bother me when people want to just dismiss the book outright because it isn't perfectly intersectional.

    Thanks for the great thought provoking posts on your blog!!

    ReplyDelete